Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karan Aanand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The arguments that the sourcing is poor have remained unrebutted. Sandstein 19:55, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Karan Aanand[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No lead roles to qualify for WP:NACTOR and not enough coverage for WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:14, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:14, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:14, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:38, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The actor is notable enough. He has played important role in the Bengali film Ami Shubhash Bolchi. He has also played an important role in the film Baby where he portrayed the character of Jamal. Apart from this he is now playing lead role in a film named Aaina. And he is passing WP:NACTOR. Also he is passing WP:GNG as he has coverages from The Times Of India, India Forums, Republic World, Telly Chakkar. Batamore (talk) 11:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject is meeting WP:NACTOR Trakinwiki (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 11:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 20:07, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Post-relist comment It would really help if those asserting GNG could provide links and analysis of sources which supposedly meet WP:GNG (Template:source assess is helpful if you are not particularly familiar with this) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 20:13, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NACTOR; no evidence of playing significant roles in multiple notable productions. Most references are either interviews or WP:NOTRS sources which not contribute to GNG. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:49, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: no significant role in movies. Fails WP:NACTOR. DEFCON5 (talk) 15:25, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I concur with Ab207's source analysis. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 20:07, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.