Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karabo Sampson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:31, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Karabo Sampson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable national beauty pageant winner (see WP:1EVENT), no other significant achievements. Fails WP:GNG. Dan arndt (talk) 11:49, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 11:55, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 11:55, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 11:57, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 11:57, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:GNG from secondary sources. Just blog posts could be found. Ceethekreator (talk) 23:07, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete total lack of sources that would allow for passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:18, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - won the national title and competed at an international level at one of the "big 4" international beauty pageants. As in sports, participating in the premier international competition indicates notability. MurielMary (talk) 12:08, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- This is not at all true. We had a long lasting RfC discussion on beauty pageants, and an attempts to create a list of competitions that entering made people default notable was rejected. MurialMary's proposal is against community consensus.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:12, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a link to this discussion? TIA. MurielMary (talk) 21:49, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.