Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kandmool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kandmool[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG and based tangentially on a single source PenulisHantu (talk) 15:27, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Indian cuisine or Delete. // Timothy :: talk 06:05, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:28, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TNT. The text is a personal essay about food likes and dislikes, while the references are random and unreliable. Bearian (talk) 16:29, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I cleaned up the article and added some citations. I don't think it's an unsourced essay anymore. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 18:09, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio

09:57, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Even after cleanup, this does not demonstrate notability under the GNG and no other SNG applies. The only two potential RS post-cleanup don't even agree on what plants kandmool is actually the root of and one is just a list of regional food names with species identifications lacking context or detail. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:53, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.