Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamibekami

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per G5. Closure of this discussion early is simply because the article was eligible for speedy deletion under G5. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 01:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kamibekami[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unfortunately, via socks, the speedy tag was removed. The prod tag was removed. So now we come here. Articles deleted numerous times, across multiple languages. Drafts declined numerous times. Lacks reliable sources. Lacks any sort of notability. Fewer than 300 subscribers on YouTube. I mean, there is nothing to suggest we need to host his information. Snackmurat (talk) 23:17, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination reasons. But I do have concern from reading a comment by @Snackmurat:, who said that JackJons7 was a sockpuppetry account. Looking at Snackmurat's contirbutions and JackJons7 non-existant talk page, there is 0 evidence (as of right now) to support that claim. If an admin sees this, they can check on the sock claim, but for now, as a non-admin, I would like to "warn" you about accusing other editors of violating Wikipedia rules without serious proof. And from what I can see, there is no existing proof of it. (You might be wise to remove that claim about the sock account until an admin can verify it.) Elijahandskip (talk) 23:25, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppet. Meat puppet. Member of the same troll farm. Whatever the proper term may be, I stand by my claim. These accounts and IP addresses are working in concert. Snackmurat (talk) 23:33, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well...I dropped a template warning on your talk page for the personal attack. I would recommend you read over Wikipedia:No personal attacks before continuing in this Afd. Elijahandskip (talk) 23:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Elijahandskip: Nonsense. There is ample evidence to support Snackmurat's claim. Drop it. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alivahedian.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah there it is. Well, I did not know about that sockpuppet investigation and was going off of the contributions from Snackmurat and JackJons7. I had seen 1 edit from JackJons7 and no investigation project page edits from Snackmurat, so I was assuming personal attacks. Please disregard those comments. (Also surprised from the "Drop it" comment...seems too strict don't you think?) Elijahandskip (talk) 00:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.