Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KC (Kevin Chilvers)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KC (Kevin Chilvers)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the multiple references in this article I can find nothing that passes WP:RS. The gentleman seems to be very enterprising, but not inherently notable. When he becomes notable he may have an article, but today is not that time. Fiddle Faddle 13:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:07, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:09, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete though numerous, the coverage does not rise to the level of significance required for a wikipedia subject. Dloh cierekim 18:40, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If kept, it should be at Kevin Chilvers. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:11, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. We can confirm that this person exists, which is good as far as it goes, but does nothing to establish any sort of notability. WP:USUAL applies, however. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 12:15, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.