Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Johanna (Joana) Altmann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:32, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

K. Johanna (Joana) Altmann[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Heavily promotional BLP, with a lack of independent sources about the subject, rather than by the subject. COI issues too. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:06, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:08, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:08, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:10, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:10, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:11, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:11, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This article is blatantly promotional and entirely the work of single editor with a clear conflict of interest. I don't think it matters whether the subject meets Wikipedia's notability criteria because WP:TNT applies to this article. Just delete it and if she's notable, start again from scratch. Deli nk (talk) 13:11, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. Was actually going through the process of WP:BEFORE for this article when the nomination was made. Unable to find any independent reliable sources which cover the article subject. - Ryk72 ^talk 13:19, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. PROMO. Agricola44 (talk) 00:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a place for promotion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:48, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Can we perhaps set up a LuxuryWikipedia, where we'd empower and celebrate iconic luxury legends and legendary luxury icons? We could make strategic alliances to create exclusive content for such a luxury resort hideaway (with silver, gold, platinum and rhodium membership helping our revenue stream). Meanwhile, PlebsWikipedia is what we're stuck with, and this has a minimal appetite for bullshit; so delete. -- Hoary (talk) 00:20, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.