Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Bösch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. But convert to article about the company Outfittery. Sandstein 20:40, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Bösch[edit]

Julia Bösch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable businessperson. Current sources are not RS and other sources not found to demonstrate notability. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 02:26, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 02:26, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 02:26, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or convert to article about the company Outfittery (currently a redirect to her). Forbes and Handelsblatt Global seem good enough RS. Co-founder Anna Alex gets a fair bit of coverage eg here, so an article on the company might be better. PamD 12:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect and convert to Outfittery. There's almost nothing to verify any of Ms. Bösch's biographical details (I'm not sure if the Forbes profile is self-written). Conversely, there are at least two reliable sources that describe the company in detail - it makes more sense to have an article on the company rather than the person. Richard3120 (talk) 20:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC)m[reply]
  • Comment a redirect and conversion of the article to be about Outfittery makes some sense to me. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 23:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:08, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 06:00, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:59, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Do not Delete as noted above the company is sizable. Raising 50m is impressive. Victuallers (talk) 12:40, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Convert to an article on the company Outfittery. WCMemail 12:58, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect and convert to article about the company per Richard3120. Yoninah (talk) 20:03, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.