Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan de Valladolid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Barkeep49 (talk) 15:18, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Juan de Valladolid[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nom: article has been draftified twice in the past two days (both reverted by me due to the article being 18.5 years old, well past the time stated in WP:DRAFTIFY 2d), which to me is a sign this should get looked at at AFD. I would propose draftification as such; an article of any age can get draftified at AFD if consensus calls for it. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 07:08, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Poetry and Spain. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 07:08, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: I have notified both the draftifiers (Dan arndt and EdmHopLover1995) on their talk pages. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 07:13, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify If this was a newer article, unilateral draftification would make sense, but the age of the article changes that. There's probably some book sources in Spanish to be found, but I don't have access to that. @EdmHopLover1995: You draftified the article with the justification of "Drafted uncited article being used to propagate misinformation on social media". Could you please explain the "misinformation" part of that? JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 11:10, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - there is an entry in the Jewish Encyclopedia and a section within the Norman Roth's 2002 book, [Conversos, Inquisition, and the Expulsion of the Jews from Spain] (page 173). Dan arndt (talk) 12:49, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - WP:HEY, per sources raised in this discussion and additional expansion of the article by Kazamzam _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:24, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article has now been improved since the AfD (which is why nominating was a good idea in this case) and refs added now demonstrate GNG. Definitely, something that we would WP:PRESERVE now. Aszx5000 (talk) 10:00, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.