Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Preston

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by Anthony Bradbury as A7. The article was also deleted as A7 in November 2008. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:56, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Preston[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very minor youtuber, most likely an autobiographical puff piece. Doesn't come anywhere close to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:23, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 00:26, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 00:26, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG entirely promotional and not encyclopedic

Delete Fails notability guidelines Neils51 (talk) 01:18, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:11, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete. I also questioned if this autobiographical. Either way, it is very much an advertisement IMHO. MensanDeltiologist (talk) 16:28, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This appears to be nothing but a puff piece and not at all encyclopedic. Sorely fails notability guidelines. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 18:23, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Essentially unreferenced BLP article about an obviously non-notable minor that doesn't even assert the significance of the subject.----Pontificalibus 18:41, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.