Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Young Jr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominated by a sockpuppet, and closed per WP:CSK. – bradv🍁 23:34, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Young Jr.[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Puffery to compensate for blatant lack of notability as per WP:GNG. Interview with the subject in an obscure magazine dated 2011 is the only source provided to establish notability of the subject as a 'nationally recognized African-American cartoonist and animator'. Coverage on the subject's person online is nearly non-existent, neither is there anything to suggest that 'Scruples', which by the article's suggestion is his notable work, is significant in its own right. With the notability of his persona or works out of the picture, what remains is that he had created the World's Longest Comic Strip in 1999. This sounds like an achievement deserving of entry into the The Guinness Book of Records, not an encyclopedia. Charmanderblue (talk) 17:55, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per WP:NTEMP! Coverage by Hartford Courant, NBC Connecticut and Patch is not puffery.

°Reprint of Hartford Courant

°NBC Connecticut

°Patch — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.211.53.246 (talk) 12:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.