Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorkhali Fazil Degree Madrasah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 03:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jorkhali Fazil Degree Madrasah[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The madrasa fails to show signs of notability. The majority of the google search results on it bring up this article or the logo uploaded in commons. The school does not even seem to have its own website. Instead on LinkedIn it says to visit the Wikipedia article for more information. And in the article, the article itself was linked as a website [1]. An article about this school on Bengali Wikipedia was deleted in December 2020. NJD-DE (talk) 20:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. NJD-DE (talk) 20:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. NJD-DE (talk) 20:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG; does not have multiple sources addressing the subject directly and in detail. The behaviour of the person who operates the Linkedin page (presumably the same person as the article creator) gives the impression that this article was created purely for promotional purposes. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, WP:NSCHOOL, WP:MILL, and WP:TNT. I agree with the reasons above, and in addition, this seems like a run of the mill school, one of thousands of small madrassas in Asia. I don't consider small private religious-based schools to be notable, since anybody with a small amount of capital and an axe to grind can start one, and granting a degree needs to be verified with a reliable source. The wording and grammar are cringe-worthy. Bearian (talk) 18:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per Nom Jenyire2 (talk) 19:15, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL / (WP:ORGCRIT) or NBUILD. Subject lacks WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV that addresses the subject directly and in-depth. None of the sources in the article are IS RS with SIGCOV and BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV. Article does not meet NBUILD, "…they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." There is basic, run of the mill, routine, normal, coverage, the type all schools receive in local press. This is a normal school, not an encyclopedic topic. // Timothy :: talk 04:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.