Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jodah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to The Gathering Dark . — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:22, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jodah[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character does not establish notability independent of Magic: The Gathering through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of overly in-depth plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 20:22, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't find any reliable sources on this. I agree; it belongs on Wikia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:18, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I couldn't find any reliable sources for this article. --Cerebellum (talk) 00:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Gathering Dark, the novel of which he's the protagonist, per WP:CHEAP. --BDD (talk) 16:46, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to The Gathering Dark and redirect, since there is almost nothing in the The Gathering Dark article at this time, and plenty of referenced information in this article. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 20:43, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge That's actually a really good idea. --BDD (talk) 20:50, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.