Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jocjonjosch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. I'm going to go ahead and close this Afd from this editor, also per WP:SK #1. The nominator fails to advance an actual argument for deletion and indicate any clear reason why this article subject is not notable -- which is what we are concerned about at Afd, not clean up issues. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jocjonjosch[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has multiple issues which can be seen on it's page, some or most of these issues can make this article more vulnerable to being deleted. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 14:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Group meets WP:GNG based on coverage by BBC and showing at Musée d'art Valais. No valid deletion rationale given. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Before assesing this, I did a search for sources and added three good ones. They meet WP:GNG based on coverage in reliable sources.198.58.171.47 (talk) 20:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.