Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joaquin Garay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 00:58, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joaquin Garay[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not seem to show notability, unles the career is much more than indicated here. DGG ( talk ) 11:42, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:43, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:28, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disney-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 19:04, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 20:25, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I expanded the article and added four sources, with a fifth in a "Further reading" section:

Disney Voice Actors: A Biographical Dictionary by Thomas S. Hischak, McFarland & Company (2011)
South of the Border with Disney: Walt Disney and the Good Neighbor Program, 1941-1948 by J.B. Kaufman, Disney Editions (2009)
Joaquin Garay - San Francisco Radio and Night Club Star profile on The Museum of the City of San Francisco's website
Disney A to Z: The Official Encyclopedia by Dave Smith, Disney Editions (1998)
Hispanics in Hollywood: A Celebration of 100 Years in Film and Television by Luis Reyes and Peter Rubie, Lone Eagle Publishing (2000)

I think that this is enough to establish notability. -- Toughpigs (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Based on the work of Toughpigs, I am satisfied that the notability requirements have been met. I think WP:NACTOR is probably met, too—the subject had a main role in The Three Caballeros and supporting roles in several other films. Dflaw4 (talk) 08:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the reliable sources identified above that show that WP:Basic is passed in my view, the museum reference is particularly convincing, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 19:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.