Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joanne Nosuchinsky

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lourdes 03:57, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Joanne Nosuchinsky[edit]

Joanne Nosuchinsky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been subject of edit-warring. I checked the sources: all of them are affiliated (press releases, PR bio) or primary (her own writing). She appeared briefly on a minor and now cancelled late night show, she won a minor beauty pageant (not a national one), and that's about it. These are not indicia of notability, and they do not support WP:GNG. Guy (Help!) 19:33, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:53, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:53, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:53, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:53, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:45, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:45, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 13:39, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep - there is definitely some reliable coverage out there, so I agree with the other two keep !vote, but at the same time I sympathize with the nominator's concerns as the article really is not in that good of a condition and most of the references in the article are unreliable. Inter&anthro (talk) 04:09, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep There is independent coverage of her being stalked (not mentioned in the article), and also of her when she was a Red Eye host (eg [1]). There's also Forbes 'Are Women On The Rise In Hosting?'[2] (by a Forbes writer, not by or based on a press release from Nosuchinsky). Agree about the quality of the article and references. RebeccaGreen (talk) 19:01, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.