Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jijo Antony

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Moot‎. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jijo Antony (2nd nomination) is open. Star Mississippi 15:11, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jijo Antony[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails BLP, GNG and BIO.

Draft was twice rejected at AfC, this is a copy paste move, draft still exists with AfC rejection comments at Draft:Jijo Antony.

Editor was blocked "for abuse of editing privileges", regarding the creation of multiple rejected drafts editor then copy pasted into mainspace User talk:Godjo J#September 2023 2 ANI Link.

Source eval:

Comments	Source
"Book my show" promo	1. "Jijo Antony". Book My Show. Retrieved 2014-03-14.
Subject one sentence mentioned. About a film	2. ^ "'Adithattu' Box Office Collection: See how much Shine Tom Chacko's deep-sea thriller earned in three days". Times of India. Retrieved 2022-07-01.
Promo interview	3. ^ "The evolution of Jijo Antony". Gulf News. Retrieved 2016-04-05.
Promo interview	4. ^ "Prithvi's Darwin is no 'Pokkiri'". On Manorama. Retrieved 2016-03-16.
Promo interview	5. ^ "Jijo Antony talks about the risks of shooting the film entirely at sea". OTTplay. Retrieved 2021-08-02.
Subject not mentioned. About a film	6. ^ "53rd Kerala State Film Awards: Complete list of winners". The Indian Express. 2023-07-21. Retrieved 2023-07-24.
404 page	7. ^ "ഓരോ സിനിമയും ഓരോ പോരാട്ടങ്ങളാണ്". Reporter Live. Retrieved 2022-07-05.
Database entry	8. ^ "Jijo Antony". FiLMiBEAT. Retrieved 2022-07-02.

BEFORE showed name listings, promo interview, nothing that meets WP:IS, WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth.

Given the history, request salt. // Timothy :: talk 03:28, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based on nom's investigation. The article as it stands is a CV with one minor note of color added, so very little is lost. I do not recommend salting for two reasons (1) this seems to be the first time this article may be deleted, (2) the subject may already be or may soon be notable, and a good faith editor should be able to create this article without requiring an admin. If this becomes a repeated problem, we can salt at that point.

Note that it's pretty likely an article could be drafted as Adithattu does indeed seem to be a significant film with a fair bit of coverage and recognition. I highly recommend going through AfC. —siro χ o 06:33, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, India, and Kerala. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:07, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. "People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards (..)The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series);" Is very very clearly the case here. Director of 4 notable films, all having received substantial coverage, as required, and the last to date won an important award. According to the guideline, he is notable.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:14, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

'Comment: Author blocked as sock. // Timothy :: talk 14:56, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.