Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiho Lee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The nomination doesn't make sense and the nominator didn't make a valid reason/argument for deletion. This nomination is being closed as a keep with no prejudice against a speedy renomination that is coherent and logically sound. (non-admin closure) Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 02:49, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jiho Lee[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Evrdkmkm (talk) 00:57, 5 May 2019 (UTC) this person is notable, too short article, unsourced and unclear texts in this article. /the ref. that they're add like the ref. maybe it's fake links and not available.--Evrdkmkm (talk) 00:57, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 May 5. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:11, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:31, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:36, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. An earlier version of this article at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jiho_Lee&oldid=894661914 is more complete and has more references, including some that had been rescued by User:InternetArchiveBot and that were subsequently removed by another editor. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:40, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
he is notable if he is famous in Thailand or Asia he will still have his article on Thai wiki and they will not removed from Thai wiki. so his fans knows him only on his social media like FB page, not in entertainment or fashion industries.--Evrdkmkm (talk) 12:22, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott Burley (talk) 06:37, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the argument "his article on Thai wiki" is not compelling per WP:OTHERLANGS - Epinoia (talk) 23:24, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:14, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the nominator says this person is notable, by which I imagine they mean it he is not notable. There are references to th.wiki which make no sense as the subject of this article is Korean and doesn’t have an article in th.wiki. If anyone wants to mount a case that the sourcing is not adequate I’ll consider changing my vote, but I’m not happy with the encyclopaedia losing content as a result of such a confused nomination. Mccapra (talk) 11:15, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comments and question. (i) The nomination makes no sense to me and I shall therefore ignore it. (ii) I note that the article says "He then modeled for some of the biggest names in fashion industry such as attitude, Kenneth Cole and ELLE Fashion Week", with no reference. (iii) If this claim were referenced, so what? Does being photographed for "biggest names" confer notability? (Being photographed to appear anywhere seems un-notable to me, but then fashion mystifies me.) (iv) Perhaps this AFD attempt should be tossed out for having an incomprehensible nomination, without prejudicing the fate of any later, coherent nomination. -- Hoary (talk) 00:00, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.