Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jen Aggleton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted as a vandalism, per CSD G3. (Non admin close) Beeblebrox (talk) 00:25, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jen Aggleton[edit]

Not a word of truth in it. Aille (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

comment It does seem awfully hoaxy, I'd like to get my hands in some of those books and see if this person is actually mentioned in them. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:16, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Definite hoax. Google has not heard of her[1]. I did a search of two books, via googlebooks, referenced in the article and they returned no hits for her last name[2][3] (you have to type her last name in the searchbar on the right). Outrageous style of the article seals the deal: a hoax. Nsk92 (talk) 03:50, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reference 6 is on amazon [4], but neither her name nor the poem "Broken Glass is a Broken Heart" is in the index or turns up in a word search.--chaser - t 04:09, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Did some digging of my own and came up with same goose egg as everyone else. Must be a hoax. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - hoax, vandalism, sockpuppet of banned user.-Boshinoi (talk) 22:30, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.