Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff mcwherter
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 16:15, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Jeff mcwherter[edit]
- Jeff mcwherter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Just another web developer with no signs of significant notability. Local awards as a "man to watch" indicate he may become notable, but not really notable yet. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:43, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I don't see any significant coverage for this guy. NickCT (talk) 15:48, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- "Comment" The author has three published books from a commercial publisher. ([1]) LaurenTGCChatMe! 20:45, 15 April 2013 (UTC)— LaurenTGC (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Comment Note that the page has been moved to Jeff McWherter since the nomination was made. If the outcome of this discussion is delete, the closing admin should delete both the original and renamed articles. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:13, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No evidence of notability. The article is clearly promotional. The creator of the article has no other contributions Adblock2 (talk) 03:20, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- "Comment" He is notable as a widely-published author. But I am certainly am new to this, so maybe there's a way to make it adequately objective?[2] LaurenTGCChatMe! 20:45, 15 April 2013 (UTC)— LaurenTGC (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008 (talk) 13:29, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- "Comment" I've included the link to his lastest book in the Library of Congress. [3] LaurenTGCChatMe! 20:45, 15 April 2013 (UTC)— LaurenTGC (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete - The subject appears to fail WP:AUTHOR as I am unable to find significant reliable source coverage of their published works. Also appears to fail WP:GNG as I am unable to locate significant independent reliable source coverage of them as a person or author. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 00:19, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.