Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jcink

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 14:07, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jcink[edit]

Made up out of whole cloth. Aille (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Que? Could you be a little more specific as to why you listed this article for ~~discussion~~? -- saberwyn 05:21, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not discussion: deletion. Drmies (talk) 05:31, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. -- saberwyn 09:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think what the nominator means is that this is something made up one day. JohnCD (talk) 20:16, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No reliable sources available. —BradV 05:22, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is no proof given, there is no proof on the internet that I can see that such a tradition a. exists and b. is important, the article seems to be little more than a link to a manual on a personal website, there is no suggestion why a specific region does not "believe in materialistic views" (whatever that may mean), etc. I could go on. Drmies (talk) 05:31, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - only source is a page on ripway.com, a free hosting site. Looks very like something made up one day. Can't find any confirmation - this History of the Piñata doesn't mention it. JohnCD (talk) 12:06, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:08, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.