Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javier Sánchez De Felipe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Javier Sánchez De Felipe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Youth academy player without a top-level appearance. Fails WP:NFOOTY. May just be too soon for an article, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.. —C.Fred (talk) 22:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is no information or statistics outside of who he is and which academy he is a part of. There is no reference made as to whether or not he has even participated in matches for Real Madrid's B team. Only sources referenced are WP:PRIMARY sources from Real Madrid's website. Real Madrid has hundreds of academy players who never end up taking the field professionally. At the very least some WP:SECONDARY sources need to be included in order to establish verified notability. This doesn't even take into account the incorrect infobox used and lack of structure, no placement of relevant categories or even WikiProject inclusion so that it can be assessed and improved by other editors. I understand that this article is a stub, but any editor creating content, should be acutely aware of the need to provide enough content to establish the need for it's presence before leaving it for future edits for risk of deletion. I've been down the same road myself, and I learned from it. unak¹⁹⁷⁸ 18:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 07:31, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:12, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 09:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the nominator first vote summaries the arguments nicely. Only Real Madrid Fain sites are provided as references and fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Also falls under WP:TOOSOON, article can easily be recreated if and when subject meets said requirements. Inter&anthro (talk) 17:21, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTBALL.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:09, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.