Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Lyon (footballer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. If an editor wants to work on an article on this subject, I'll be happy to restore to Draft space or you can request this at WP:REFUND Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

James Lyon (footballer)[edit]

James Lyon (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG, coverage is limited to brief mentions in match writeups and non-independent reporting by his club. signed, Rosguill talk 20:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per this decent article, [1], other bits like [2], the cites on the article already, more around in google is enough for me for basic WP:GNG thanks. Govvy (talk) 22:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree with Dougal18's evaluation of these sources below (although the Sun citation is really just a mere mention even before we consider the paper's reliability). signed, Rosguill talk 13:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Herald contains a couple of sentences and his boss waffling on about Lyon. The Sun is depreciated, the cites on the article are either non independent (PTFC) or mentions in match reports (BBC). He fails GNG. Dougal18 (talk) 12:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Lyon has literally today moved on loan to a new club, I have already added new sources covering this and will continue to update the page and add content and sources when necessary. This move will only provide the page with more detail. Partickthistle123 (talk)
  • Comment I really don't understand the persecution of Scottish football league players at times. They get similar coverage to English players. I still don't get why people don't like general coverage. Govvy (talk) 14:40, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:16, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. Herald source is OKish, Sun is absolutely not. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify, maybe TOOSOON, but he's playing pro football and already has some coverage.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:48, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 23:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.