Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Dudman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:27, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Dudman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an actor. Most of the coverage is in blogs and similar questionable sources. Fails WP:NACTOR for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. - Mr X 18:53, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - TheMagnificentist 12:14, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - he's not an actor (see WP:CREATIVE); he's a run of the mill YouTube "personality". Bearian (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 18:58, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Does appear with John Culshaw on the BBC's Doctor Who site here: http://www.doctorwho.tv/whats-new/video/watch-jon-culshaw-and-jake-dudman-in-the-great-curator/ Are Jake Dudman and Jake Dundsbridge the same person? Ross-c (talk) 20:56, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the only argument presented for a "weak keep" is a dead link. EDIT: That link has become live again but seems to consist of an interview with a different guy who mentions seeing subject's YouTube video. Darthamender (talk) 11:35, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 18:50, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now. He does not meet WP:ENTERTAINER, but I suspect in the future he will have enough coverage in reliable, published sources to be reconsidered. I just think someone is jumping the gun a little with a dedicated Wikipedia page after two YouTube videos Pupsbunch (talk) 19:06, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.