Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaishankar Chigurula (Director)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G5) by Bbb23 (non-admin closure) Anup [Talk] 19:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jaishankar Chigurula (Director)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CREATIVE: I can find no significant coverage of him or his work in WP:RS online. Sole claim to fame appears to be "created a world record as the lowest-budget feature film of the 21st century". Well, that's an absurd claim, as filmmakers around the world make feature films for less money than 2400 USD. The film has had mentions and reviews on film blogs, but appears to have made no major impact on the enormous Indian film market, as you might expect for a horror film made on a shoestring budget. Jaishankar Chigurula was speedied six times db-bio in 2014-15, and it's since been re-created umpteen times under various spellings (WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Jaishankar Chigurula/Archive), and newer WP:SPAs appear to still be active on this latest one created in July, and on associated articles. Wikishovel (talk) 08:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for the reasons cited above:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 08:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 08:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom, also the sources don't seem to be independent and the whole article comes across as promotional. WP:NOTPROMOTION. ronaz ^Talk! 08:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep ar Movesources is notable i read some Telugu Articles in sources. about this person.in 2014-15s he is not notable but 2016 hes debut film 21 was released in cinemas. now he is notable. i think you don't know to read Telugu sources reference articles. hes 21 film lowest-budget film is not a promotional. you want to read ones again all the reference. please don't tag deletion again with out reading the reference.Surya Rajam (talk) 10:03, 21 October 2016 (UTC) — Surya Rajam (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete: Jaishankar Chigurula (Director): I do not see any substantial credit or any such coverage of subject in any credible sources. It fails WP:DIRECTOR, and WP:GNG. I'm not even sure for TOOSOON for him (rather seems TOOFAR). Given that it has been deleted seven times previously, I'd ask closing administrator to also salt this, Jaishankar Chigurula title.

21 (2016 film): again nothing substantial for this film in any reliable sources. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Anup [Talk] 10:05, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KeepThis article Jaishankar Chigurula (Director) has a notability to Keep WikiProject Biography. sources is clear don't be jealous on film makers. & don't make a personal attacks. the article has a good sources WP:GNG.

21 (2016 film) also has a good sources cheek the bookmyshow.com References you get notability WP:NFILM Rohith Shetty (talk) 11:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)— Rohith Shetty (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Comment Wrongfully accusing people of personal attacks IS a personal attack. ronaz ^Talk! 12:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This both article your claim in wrong because we don't want to see impact on the enormous Indian film market that kind of business thinking not good for Wikipedia.Jaishankar Chigurula (Director), 21 (2016 film) both has a good sources & References if you delete this articles we want to delete 1000s of articles from Wikipedia because this articles has a good sources more than so meany articles on Wikipedia. please you just stop your business thinking Naresh Kumar aavula (talk) 12:49, 21 October 2016 (UTC) — Naresh Kumar aavula (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Keep we want to keep this article because there have a 15 significant WP:RS different websites References coverage links from online. & this article in biographies of living persons policy this policy articles can be increase notability day by day & i saw all the links of him 21 is a truly lowest-budget feature film of the 21st century. & this article being in Wikipedia few months. some senior editors also edited this article. you may cheek history. & Jaishankar Chigurula was speedied six times db-bio in 2014-15 removed. why because that old article created before his film release so Jaishankar Chigurula old article not reliable to claim. if we can delete this article they can create again & again its never stop. it can be happen so meany new biographies of living persons articles. we don't want to remove this article has a chance to be WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. chsrivaas (talk) 16:27, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.