Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Polick (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Polick[edit]

Jack Polick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actor, currently the only external link is IMDB. I have completed WP:BEFORE and cannot find anything substantial.

This was first nominated for AfD in 2010, when it was deemed that his “cult status” in Jackass made him “notable”. There appear to be no substantial sources to back up this claim. Looking through his IMDb credits, it’s clear that all of his other roles were minor or uncredited.

Since 2010, there have been no sources added to the article and no major edits either. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:20, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:20, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:20, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:20, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:20, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:20, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:20, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete if any of his roles had true cult status, we would have sources to back up this claim. Until people provide reliable 3rd party inbdepent sources showing this to be the case we should delete the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Though he has appeared in some big films, none of the subject's roles appear significant enough to meet WP:NACTOR. I haven't found any non-trivial coverage on him, either. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:11, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.