Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. B. Turner (author)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sources provided by the keep !vote do not seem to be reliable and would not overturn the overwhelming consensus to delete after analyses by the other !voters. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

J. B. Turner (author)[edit]

J. B. Turner (author) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I fail to see how this guy meets WP:NAUTHOR. I expected to find even just one real review but all I can find are Amazon reviews and goodreads and literally nothing in the way of coverage of the author himself. CUPIDICAE💕 18:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:31, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:31, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Agreed with nominator. There is almost no other information about him except his books. –Cupper52Discuss! 18:34, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nom. Oaktree b (talk) 18:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. No evidence of notability, coverage not outside Amazon, Goodreads and his website. --Ashleyyoursmile! 18:52, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Are any of these links helpful in proving notability? I say Keep if so as don't like to see any author deleted.

I thought he might be self-published only, which is fine, but has a legit agent at a big agency and is or has been published by Thomas & Mercer, which are legit and publish big names but are connected to Amazon which is why a lot of his sources probably points to there. --LostLogin (talk) 21:14, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.