Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It Ends With Us (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify‎. ✗plicit 23:30, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It Ends With Us (film)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON article about a film in the production pipeline, not yet demonstrated as the subject of enough reliable source coverage to exempt it from the primary notability criteria at WP:NFILM.
As always, the rule is not that every film is automatically entitled to keep an article the moment principal photography starts on it -- even after photography has commenced, most films still aren't notable until they've been released and started to garner attention from film critics. A film has to have a hell of a lot more than just a couple of stray casting announcements before it earns a special notability pass under WP:NFF, but a couple of stray casting announcements is all the sourcing this has.
It also warrants note that this was started in draftspace by a blocked IP number, and then got arbitrarily moved into mainspace by a logged-in user outside of WP:AFC process literally within seconds (seriously, the time stamp on both the original creation and the page move is 14:35 May 24), thus suggesting the possibility of sock or meat puppetry.
Obviously no prejudice against recreation if and when this comes out, but a couple of casting announcements is not enough coverage to make a film already notable while it's still in the pipeline. Bearcat (talk) 19:45, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 19:45, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify per nominator. It should blow it over and start it again. CastJared (talk) 21:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't merit an article; it's possible that it will do so later. Therefore draftify. -- Hoary (talk) 23:19, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify would indeed be the best course of action.TH1980 (talk) 02:18, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dratify, WP:TOOSOON. Suonii180 (talk) 07:37, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.