Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ironbank-Cherry Gardens Football Club

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hills Football League. Daniel (talk) 22:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ironbank-Cherry Gardens Football Club[edit]

Ironbank-Cherry Gardens Football Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local village football team that plays against other village teams in the region. Represents the villages of Ironbank, South Australia and Cherry Gardens, South Australia both with around 500 inhabitants. No independent reliable sources. The Devaney book, is by something called 'Full Points Publication, which has a website [https://fullpointspublications.wordpress.com/2016/01/22/about-full-points-publications/ but the website indicates that this 'publishing house' is a one-man-band by Mr Devaney, and is essentially self-published. The book by Mr Lines is also self-published Bumbubookworm (talk) 12:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously deleted via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:35, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect, possibly to Hills Football League as suggested above. Three rather different views already expressed on what to do with the article, though I think looking at the article itself, and the opinions given, redirecting at this time is perhaps the best course of action. Article doesn't seem notable enough to be standalone but could be a useful redirect term and the history is then preserved. Bungle (talkcontribs) 20:05, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.