Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iris Apatow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bbb23 (talk) 23:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iris Apatow[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This actress has no significant roles nor won any awards or recognitions to meet WP:NACTOR. Most of the coverage I have seen are brief passing mentions on articles that focus on her parents and older sister. Them being notable actors, directors, and filmmakers do not add notability to her per WP:NOTINHERITED The Legendary Ranger (talk) 23:32, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 May 9. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:58, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Might be notable at some point, but does not seem notable now. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 03:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. WP:NACTOR is actually pretty permissive: C1 says you have to have had "significant" roles in multiple notable productions. She gets by that, I think, with This Is 40 and Love. Both roles were supporting, but (IMO) they were significant. A lack of SIGCOV about her performance in either of those roles, however, leads me to recommend deleting. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 02:57, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 02:57, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. Not seeing a whole lot of coverage of her film career. One of the sources is "Leslie Mann's Daughter Iris, 16, Claps Back After Mom Critiques Her Makeup on Instagram". Freaking EPIC clapback! Wow!!! Surely she'll be notable someday. jp×g 03:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 20:51, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Leslie Mann Undoubtedly she'll get roles beyond her family in the not-too-distant future, but for now a redirect to her mother with her roles mentioned is proper. Nate • (chatter) 03:48, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Actress in her own right in popular series and feature films, verifiable so meets . Meets notability.

User:Hildreth gazzard (talk) 09:47, 18 May 2021 (BST)

Keep I'm voting Keep just based on the common sense principle. I realize that, by Wikipedia regulations, her notability is at best borderline, but deleting the page now is most likely just delaying the inevitable. That is to say, the page will probably return anyway, in the not-too-distant future. It's possible her career could fizzle out completely, but that doesn't seem likely. She will almost certainly achieve notability by Wikipedia's standards in the upcoming years if she hasn't already. She's also already received plenty of press for her role in Love, and she'll almost certainly receive more coverage for The Bubble and any future roles. I know Wikipedia isn't meant to predict the future, but this particular subject seems like she'll be a no-brainer for inclusion pretty soon and is on the cusp as it stands anyway.Gargleafg (talk) 16:27, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:20, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. At this point, the subject of this article does not meet basic guidelines for WP:N in terms of wp:sigcov. Indeed, she is an actress, but not a notable one in any way. inclusion of this article in the project is wp:indiscriminate. GhostDust (talk) 05:23, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Leaning towards delete. Any other thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Most of the coverage is just in passing (her being mentioned in articles about family members), or routine coverage of her being a supporting cast member in a certain show/movie. I can't find any article profiling her in detail, so I agree she doesn't meet WP:GNG and hasn't been in any significant enough roles to meet WP:NACTOR. Uses x (talk • contribs) 12:46, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.