Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ipsy (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Jytdog (talk) 08:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ipsy (company)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just another online retailer with marginal notability the sources here are multiply cited company website, press releases, and the USERGENERATED crunchbase and owler databases. There are a couple of independent refs that discuss the company but they are mostly about Michelle Phan who has her own article. Jytdog (talk) 19:34, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:40, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:40, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This has been through the Draft process at least twice now, and its fundamental problems haven't been addressed. --Calton | Talk 02:44, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I've added business publication references to "Further reading". The student editor creating this was not familiar with our requirement that sources be independent and about the company, not the founder. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StarryGrandma (talk • contribs) 04:39, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.