Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingrid Halstensen (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ‎ speedy keep WP:CSK #2c. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ingrid Halstensen[edit]

Ingrid Halstensen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable journalist and sports anchor. Edit.pdf (talk) 08:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong keep, just because the sources aren’t in English doesn’t justify deleting the article, refer to WP:GLOBAL. There are 9 independent and reliable sources in the article for only two paragraphs, and every statement about her made in the article is supported by multiple references. It almost definitely passes WP:NBLP.
Here’s an analysis of the sources that are used in the article:
  • Verdens Gang, the most read online newspaper in Norway[1]
  • Nettavisen, one of the most popular news websites in Norway, no reliability issues.[2]
  • Aftenposten, is Norway's largest printed newspaper by circulation.[3]
This feels like it’s going down the same path as the last nomination and I want an explanation from the nominator as to why Ingrid doesn’t pass notability with the amount of references in the article. It almost definitely passes WP:BEFORE (which the nominator should have checked before opening), as you can find way more sources about her by just performing a simple Google search than is actually used in the article(as that would be reference clutter). This should have just been reopened if you wanted a clearer consensus. FatalFit | ✉   10:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.