Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperial Concubine Chun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jiaqing Emperor. $Salvio$ 10:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial Concubine Chun[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge and Redirect to Jiaqing Emperor. WP:NOTEVERYTHING and article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. My WP:BEFORE turned up nothing. Similar article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concubine En was recently redirected. // Timothy :: talk 04:13, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 04:13, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 04:13, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Merge to Concubines of the Jiaqing Emperor. I expect there will be some more information about at least some of these women. The material as it stands isn’t enough to support a series of stand-alone articles but there is enough for a single article with a couple of paras in each of them.Mccapra (talk) 08:45, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:05, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Manchu. Still too poor to stand alone for now MissiYasında&& (talk) 18:54, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge/redirect targets are different
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp 💬 19:00, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Jiaqing Emperor as was determined by the AfD discussion on the article about Concubine En, cited by the nominator. We want all the articles on concubines that are being redirected going to the same target. Manchu is much too broad a topic to be a good target for this. Mccapra (talk) 05:13, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.