Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ImpediMed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:18, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ImpediMed[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing enough independent sources to support notability. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:59, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:35, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 22:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:55, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I have looked at all of the eight cited references. Six of them are not independent sources (five sources on Impedimed's own web site and a press release). Another one is a "Media release" from the Australian stock exchange announcing a commercial deal, and the other is on a pay for view site and I haven't seen it, but judging from its title ( "ImpediMed unveils its game changer: Sozo") it is just an announcement of a product launch. The earliest pages of hits on a Google search for Impedimed are full of things such as Impedimed's own web site, the Wikipedia article, Twitter, LinkedIn, a report of a financial deal, Facebook, PR Newswire, pages of statistics about ImpediMed's financial performance, and so on. Nothing that begins to indicate notability in Wikipedia's terms. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per analysis by User:JamesBWatson. I had a look at the source in The Australian mentioned as inaccessible above, and it primarily revolved around a product called "Sozo" and only mentioned the company briefly. Sozo may be notable, but I don't think that ImpediMed is. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 13:06, 31 March 2017 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.