Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ikot Mkpang

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 17:48, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ikot Mkpang[edit]

Ikot Mkpang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of meeting WP:NPLACE: that this place is legally recognised and not just mentioned in online databases. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: at first glance, this looks very non-notable on a satellite image (assuming Google went to the right place)
This brings back painful memories of a very long contentious AfD about a similar uninhabited place on the map in Nigeria:
It didn't help that there was some involvement with a troll group.
--A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 22:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here's our List of villages in Cross River State article. There is an "Ikot Mkpang Esighi" village listed in Bakassi, however that district is much further away from Calabar and now part of Cameroon. There's no other "Ikot Mkpang" on the list.
--A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 23:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.