Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IFBB Best in the World

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to International Federation of BodyBuilders. Black Kite (talk) 18:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IFBB Best in the World[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable sports event. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:09, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 03:11, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bodybuilding-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 03:11, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The first competition by what seems to be a now large and notable organisation, and a quick search shows that large numbers of bodybuilders cite their results at this competition. I think it would be feasible to find more third-party coverage in offline sources. Triptothecottage (talk) 03:33, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:39, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unreferenced. As written, fails WP:V and WP:N. When refs are added, do ping me and I'll reconsider my argument. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:53, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 20:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to International Federation of BodyBuilders. No sources present to support individual notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.