Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horror Story (2013 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 19:48, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Horror Story (2013 film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable movie, not even scheduled for release for another month. Fails as TOOSOON Caffeyw (talk) 08:26, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:45, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:45, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Note: Please consider reading WP:INDAFD which includes some points about WikiProject India AFDs. Those may or may not be applicable here. Tito☸Dutta 14:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The edit history will show that this was inadvertantly closed too early. I have reversed that action and re-listed the film on the above delsorts. User:Titodutta is invited to offer a comment and/or an !vote, but we we can let this run its course. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 11:23, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep or redirect to Vikram Bhatt with history. This has gotten quite a bit of coverage, but at the same time is a little lighter than I'd like for an upcoming film. It's considered to be a decent amount of coverage for an Indian film when you take into consideration how their media covers films and actors, but if this isn't kept then I think it should redirect to Bhatt's article with the history intact. It's likely that this will get more coverage as the release date grows closer, although I know that this is no guarantee. In any case I suggest Bhatt since almost all of the media focus so far has been centered on him moreso than anyone else involved in the movie. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:06, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The release date is only two weeks away and it meets WP:GNG with a fairly notable cast, and as per the points above from TokyoGirl about decent coverage, etc. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 11:31, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Film is to release in two weeks (i'ts completed) and has enough coverage to meet WP:GNG now and will meet WP:NF in 2 weeks. User:Tokyogirl79's suggestion of redirect would be far more sensible if this were to release in 4 months rather than in two weeks. WP:NFF requires completion ( Done!) and ample coverage ( Done!). Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 23:20, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep and comment: The nomination has not followed WP:BEFORE. Their two concerns are a) non-notable film (a simple search proves its notability) b) film will release in one month — which is a reason to keep and not to delete. Editors think nom's AFD are creating lots of unnecessary work. So, few suggestions, you have nominated the film's article because it is not going to release in next 2 weeks, but actually Bollywood film articles are written much before their releases. There are many articles where the films are not going to release in next 6—8 months or more. Consider following WP:BEFORE and WP:INDAFD and if you have question on Indian films or AFD process, you can post at my talk page clicking here, I'll try to help. Best --Tito☸Dutta 13:55, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: Notability. Mind clicking 'More links' at bottom. Anup Mehra ^✈ 16:59, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:Clearly notable. Yes, I realize it links to an argument to avoid. But, come on. It's clearly notable. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 17:17, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets notability criteria.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:11, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.