Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hope of Jesus Children's Home
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 04:58, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hope of Jesus Children's Home[edit]
- Hope of Jesus Children's Home (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. non-notable organisation. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 16:17, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No reliable independent sources to be found discussing this relatively new and quite small orphanage. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources besides the organization's own website and DVDs. Iglooflame (talk) 17:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As I said when I requested a discussion on this article's fate, when I wrote it there was nothing but info that came from the Home's DVD and websites. I very rarely write articles where I can find no independent sources. However, this is a legitimate organization and I did check to see that it has no adverse comments or ratings in such places as the Better Business Bureau or Ministry Watch. If this organization was questionable, Ministry Watch would take interest. Also, if this is deleted, which seems to be the consensus, I will try to gather independent info from organizations that I know have provided support and individuals who have visited the Home or even helped with site construction and remodelling there. This, however, will take time.Bill Pollard (talk) 21:48, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:CORP. Terence7 (talk) 17:26, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.