Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hood's Law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted - CSD'd/A11 by Anthony Bradbury.. (non-admin closure). →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hood's Law[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - article does not demonstrate its own notability. DJAMP4444 (talk) 19:16, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A11 (something someone made up one day). So tagged. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:32, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.