Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High Commission of Mozambique, London

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of diplomatic missions of Mozambique. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:28, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

High Commission of Mozambique, London[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non claim of notability. No evidence of in depth independent coverage. No independent references. Nothing obvious in google with in depth coverage. PROD removed and discussion added to the talk page, which included neither a policy-based rationale or references. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:27, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence of meeting WP:ORG through third party sources. there is also no inherent notability of embassies as previous embassy articles have been deleted. LibStar (talk) 06:55, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I added some references, but they were not extensive. —Anne Delong (talk) 05:30, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately the only referernce that isn't just a passing mention isn't independent. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of diplomatic missions of Mozambique; insufficiently notable. Pburka (talk) 03:31, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.