Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herminigildo Ranera (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× 00:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Herminigildo Ranera[edit]

Herminigildo Ranera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that she meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. I am aware I may be missing something in Tagalog sources. Last AfD had very low participation, so no consensus. As this has been waiting in CAT:NN for 14 years, I really hope we can now get a discussion going. Boleyn (talk) 18:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Tito Pao, Probably lack of quorum. Rfd's can be closed comfortably with at least two votes but Afd is supposed to have a wider audience. --Lenticel (talk) 22:26, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I tried to look at the News archives for articles but most of the info that I found are shows for orchestras that he was conducting for rather than about him as a person/musician. Maestro just means he's a conductor. --Lenticel (talk) 01:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 21:05, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I can't find any significant coverage. Other editors have had 14 years to do so. At this point, absent any evidence to the contrary, it seems fair to assume there aren't any. Jfire (talk) 03:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep Being conductor of the Philippine Philharmonic Orchestra, along with other high profile accomplishments, sounds notable. Agree that lack of RS is a problem. Llajwa (talk) 20:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO. Source in article is a name mention in a list, and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing. Ping me if sources are found.  // Timothy :: talk  18:08, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.