Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hendrik von Kuenheim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 04:04, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hendrik von Kuenheim[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like a CV. No indication of notability beyond working for bmw Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:32, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:32, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:32, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. I'm in the process of editing an article. I'd still like to leave her here. This is a unique person. It is thanks to him that BMW has combined a number of regions into one new sales region and he is the first in the history of its head.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Moreagency (talk • contribs) 21:23, May 23, 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 03:57, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG, just some mid+ level business executive. WP:NOT Who's Who in middle+ management. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:23, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Senior Vice Presidents of Sales Regions aren't regarded notable outside their company, WP:GNG. Also meets WP:YOURSELF, paid article (for a birthday gift, tsss...). Ben Ben ^(talk) 13:11, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No offense is intended to the individual, but the entry has no substantial external notability; the citations are mostly from his employer's site. I could easily do the same from my employer's website. The article text itself lacks objectivity and feels like a resume or advertisement. User Keneckert — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.104.228.185 (talk) 06:09, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks notability which is unsurprising given his position. The allegations of paid editing are troubling if true - which I found some evidence of when I briefly looked - and would add another reason to delete. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:37, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable and reads more like a resume than an article. Primary sourcing to inflate a mid-level manager Lubbad85 (☎) 19:17, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.