Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heap41a
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Heap41a[edit]
- Heap41a (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Although article is about the virus, it is mainly promoting the AutoHotkey Sourov0000 (talk) 17:40, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lacks reliable independent sources to establish notability under WP:GNG. Googling, virtually all the coverage is in WP:QUESTIONABLE blogs and similar sources. The only possibly WP:RELIABLE source I could find was a one-line mention in a Telegraph article. This just isn't sufficient. Msnicki (talk) 18:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete—Best source I could find was Mcafee, but it looks like this is either a slightly different virus or there's no agreement as to what the name should be. Not enough in the way of reliable sources, thus not enough notability. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 00:12, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.