Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hays Travel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:05, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hays Travel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A promotionally-toned page on an unremarkable private travel company, going about its business. Sources I see are PR-driven and do not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. The page created by Special:Contributions/Johncavehays with no other contributions outside of this topic. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:06, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:07, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:07, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Only references out there come from the company's website or typical business directories, social media pages, and other sorts of travel-related promotional sites. Nothing that would meet notability requirements.Glendoremus (talk) 04:20, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the article may have issues but I don't think WP:CORPDEPTH is one of them e.g. here. I think it may be "unremarkable" but it is notable. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 22:37, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Concur with nom, fails WP:NCORP. Insufficient in-depth independent coverage in RS. Chroniclelive mention above is probably a republished press-release by the company. MB 04:35, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article which still retains much of its original text by the WP:SPA account User:Johncavehays. My searches are finding nothing beyond routine announcements (including the above-linked Chronicle item on an acquisition). It is a relatively-large firm in its business sector, but I see nothing to indicate encyclopaedic notability, whether by WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:58, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough in-depth to demonstrate notability. Do not believe the source from a local newspaper is anything other than "trivial or incidental coverage" per WP:CORPDEPTH. AusLondonder (talk) 23:41, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant reliable coverage.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:07, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.