Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayley Finch
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:05, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hayley Finch[edit]
- Hayley Finch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable person that does not show any research, resembles a Facebook/Myspace profile and is written in an unencyclopedic, informal tone. No outstanding info in the infobox and has not made much progress since being created in 2005. Shows vanity and made-up info. The links were pulled off a blog and a car-racing website showing pornography. ÆÅM «(fætsøn!) 08:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO. Merely appearing in Playboy is not enough. DARTH PANDAduel 14:51, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutralspeedy as written, but the problem is [1] gnews would seem to indicate she might pass WP:N, (albeit barely), even when the second Hayley Finch from Kansas is accounted for. I don't have access to the articles due to subscription required, but thought it should be brought up for discussion.Horrorshowj (talk) 07:32, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No independent reliable sources prove any notability. Tosqueira (talk) 04:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.