User talk:Tosqueira

This user may have left Wikipedia. Tosqueira has not edited Wikipedia since November of 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Tosco? --Nice poa (talk) 03:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Dubladores de anime...) perfeito!!! :o)))) --Nice poa (talk) 05:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Haldan[edit]

Hi, I was wondering why you are questioning the notability of Paul Haldan? He competed at, the Summer Olympic Games, World Championships, European Championships and European Top-12 Championships, a table tennis player can't go much further than that. Amanda ^T/C 07:51, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheguei tarde... estava viajando e só voltei hj... mas qdo precisar, pode me chamar. --Nice poa (talk) 06:17, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindemburg Melão Jr.[edit]

The deletion prod for this article was contested by an anonymous IP. I have listed the article for a formal AfD now and thought that you might want to comment in it. Nsk92 (talk) 05:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UWC[edit]

Não entendo nada deste assunto!!! :o) To por fora... mas se dizes, eu acredito. Deixa alguém mais comentar, depois eu vou. --Nice poa (talk) 07:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nico Christ[edit]

Thanks for notifying us of nl:Nico Christ. I nominated the article for regular deletion, so it'll be gone in two weeks. Regards, Erwin85 (talk) 10:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monumento ao Bombeiro[edit]

Obrigado pela informação. Porém, não consegui abrir os ficheiros pdf, e a outra fonte não estabelece qualquer notabilidade para este monumento. Por isso, manterei a minha posição no AfD. Cumprimentos, Hús ö nd 12:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tosqueira, o fato de o monumento existir e ter sido criado pelo Bottelho não os tornam imediatamente dignos de nota na wikipédia. Vá um qualquer cidade grande e veja a quantidade de momumentos espalhados na rua, a maioria feitos por artista desconhecidos e nenhum impacto cultural. Sinceramente não estou convencido que esse tal Bottelho seja culturalmente relevante e que tenha uma biografia já escrita por terceiros.Lechatjaune (talk) 14:13, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As prorrogações por mudança no rumo da votação são bastante controversas e eu não sei se me atreveria a fazê-lo com um score conclusivo. Quando ao artigo em questão, o correto é eu me abster. Sou da opinião que se deve ter argumentos para votar e não apenas impressões. Lechatjaune (talk) 00:04, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Magalhães Herrmann[edit]

Olá. :-) Claro, vou dar uma olhada. Cumprimentos, Hús ö nd 22:52, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD[edit]

Oi, Tosqueira. Tu sabe quais são os critérios usados pelos sysops deste projeto para eliminar ou manter uma página. Pelo que vi, não há um regras fixas e "algorítmicas" como na wiki-pt. Obrigado, Lechatjaune (talk) 22:13, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado, Tosqueira. Acho que temos muito o que aprender com outros projetos. Você já deve ter reparado que as PEs na pt.wiki vão de mal a pior. A minha principal preocupação é como os editores, em modo geral, aceitam o arbítrio do sysop. Eu imagino que, se não contasse votos sem justificativa ou com justificativa deficiente na pt.wiki, íam querer minha cabeça. Lechatjaune (talk) 13:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aí você tocou num assunto importante, Tosco: os critérios de relevância. Eu sempre fui defensor deles, mas não tenho participado da discussão por simples displicência. Eu não vi a sua opinião por lá. Você que já tem alguma experiência aqui na wiki.en, o que você acha? Lechatjaune (talk) 17:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Siri[edit]

Tosco, eu sou muito ruim para argumentar em inglês, e nem sei se o que eu digo é levado em conta ou não... em todo o caso, dei minha opinião lá. Se achares que está muito ruim, me avisa (to com vergonha...) --Nice poa (talk) 05:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Polish Wikipedia AfD - Autocunnilingus[edit]

Greetings,
I am writing here as your discussion page on pt.wiki is hard protected.

I have sent your request further and put it on a fast track AfD page.

Thank you for your cooperation, I would expect the end of the case in a few days.

Best regards,
aegis maelstrom δ 10:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Polish Wikipedia - Jamendo[edit]

Hi! According to the same deletion log you mentioned firstly the article Jamendo will stay alive also at our project. If you have any similar problems in the future please contact one of administrators (here) or create a new request in our speedy delete thread (here). Regards, Patrol110 (talk) 05:54, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re.Sockpuppet[edit]

Olá Tosqueira e obrigado por me alertares sobre esta situação. Neste momento encontro-me muito ocupado por isso só tive tempo para dar uma breve olhada nessas contas de utilizador. Não decidi ainda se irei bloquear ambas as contas, ou se bloquearei apenas uma e entregarei à outra uma firme notificação sobre a proibição de se utilizarem sockpuppets. Amanhã já me debruço melhor sobre isto. Ou, se a utilização abusiva destas socks se tornar de repente muito urgente suprimir, recomendo que comuniques a situação ao WP:ANI. Se não, amanhã cá estarei para resolver. Cumprimentos, Hús ö nd 21:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Páginas em avaliação[edit]

Hi! I posted a comment here. --Carioca (talk) 03:48, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bad AfD for Kotava[edit]

When adding an AfD to an article, remember that you need to have an edit summary on the edit that adds the AfD label mentioning that you have put the article up for AfD, as mentioned on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion. It's not fair otherwise to the editors of the article--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:09, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the earlier CSD request also emphatically needed an edit summary. These are important things, since people get very frustrated when their article is deleted without proper notice.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:04, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Kotava[edit]

I note that the article about Kotava was deleted. Once again victim of the bad faith and refusal of some people without culture and who do not examine in any manner the quoted links. The world of the artificial languages is a crab basket. But the important thing is elsewhere, in real speakers and the ISO criteria are very more serious than the judgements-like of students or a database of the Google god.

Incidentally, I inform to you that Kotava is one of the languages of the MediaWiki software (version 1.12 and following) of Wikipedia. Nice contradiction!

And if you want it in Kotava:

Rabaté da teliz icde Kotava su zo sular. Ware konviele kosik ke rotuxara is vewara ke arayiskaf abictan meinde rindes va ozwani gluyasiki. Tamava ke vegedunaveem tir tulkita. Vexe zolone arlize tir, koe ageltaf usikeem ise ISO ludeem tid lodekemapafa dam yona ravesikafa malhejara ok origak ke Google lorik.

Ostik, va rin walzé da Kotava tir tana ava ke MediaWiki talpeyot (1.12 siatos az ar) ke Wikipedia. Kevkalipira !

Remain with your little certainties. -( —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimistusik (talk • contribs) 21:13, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion tag of Kotava in Korean wikipedia[edit]

Hi, it seemed to be you devoted to deletion of Kotava article in English wikipedia, but why did you attempt to deletion onlyin Korean wikipedia? I found there was no other wikipedia what you tagged deletion tag. Korean wikipedia has its own deletion rule, and deletion in English wikipedia cannot reason for deletion in Korean wikipedia. It's up to agreement of Korean wikipedians.Noropdoropi (talk) 04:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Political positions of Dilma Rousseff[edit]

Please note that this article is not spam, and please don't subst speedy deletion tags. Stifle (talk) 21:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:WaldnerTraining2.gif[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:WaldnerTraining2.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:36, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]