Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayden Panettiere filmography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hayden Panettiere. Cirt (talk) 00:16, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hayden Panettiere filmography[edit]

I'm not sure why this page was created to begin with. The main Hayden Panettiere article has a filmography, which has now been updated with tabling and any omitted major appearances. After this page was created, with a tabled filmography, someone came in, tagged it for merger, and then removed the tabled filmography and pasted in the IMDB filmography, nearly as is. This page is redundant to material in the main article and its existence really is unnecessary. Wildhartlivie (talk) 19:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The main article is sufficient. Same information in both articles anyway. Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 19:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. There's not nearly enough credits to warrant a separate article. Pinkadelica ^{Say it...} 19:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Redundant with main article. Ward3001 (talk) 20:30, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete wonderful actor, but please... a separate page just for this?--Paul McDonald (talk) 20:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above, this is excessive and unnecessary. - eo (talk) 20:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As noted above, the filmography at her main page suffices. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:04, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Since it seems the original author of this page provided some of the missing entries in the main article, I've been bold and redirected to credit him per GFDL. - Mgm|^(talk) 23:52, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think I see the intent here as I have noted a move towards making bibliographies for notable authors and I think some filmographies for notable actors into separate lists, but Hayden's resume and notability don't warrant such a separate list at this time. Come back when she's in the same league as Katherine Hepburn and we'll talk. 23skidoo (talk) 15:40, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: There have been separate filmographies for those actors whose work is exceedingly prolific for some time, but yes, this doesn't approach the size, nor the detail, that would support separation. Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:03, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.