Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harehills Amateur Rugby League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 02:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Harehills Amateur Rugby League[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Amateur sports team, no independent sources to establish any sort of notability. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:59, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clubs playing in local district leagues clearly aren't notable. J Mo 101 (talk) 18:40, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:53, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Could have gone for speedy, no refs, a junior team in which the league doesn't even have a page. Szzuk (talk) 21:23, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.