Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hardik Malaviya
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hardik Malaviya[edit]
- Hardik Malaviya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to meet WP:GNG. Article is about Hardik Malaviya (Fictional Character) but no reference was provided. It looks like a total vandalism as the article creator is also Hardik98248. Sourov0000 (talk) 19:31, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Note: Please consider reading WP:INDAFD which includes some points about WikiProject India AFDs. Those may or may not be applicable here. Tito☸Dutta 23:09, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt There is a bit of history of various approaches to creating articles on this subject which then have to be deleted: [1]. The present version is woven around a character named "Hardik" in Go Goa Gone; it isn't clear whether this shares anything more than a forename with the subject of this article, which has no substantiating evidence. Being a "Naghty Student" isn't notability in Wikipedia terms. AllyD (talk) 20:04, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:24, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.