Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haining Open

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Notability requirements have been meet. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:30, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Haining Open[edit]

Haining Open (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article's first reference discusses the player mentioned in its title, not the event, second reference hits a 404 error (dead link). There may be references in Chinese to indicate the notability of this article's subject, but there do not appear to be sufficient English language sources that do. Failing their appearance, I propose it be deleted. KDS4444Talk 13:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  14:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  14:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  14:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 16:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Two of the keep !votes are not policy based arguments putting this discussion at 1 delete and 1 keep. The WP:BURDEN is on the keep camp to show GNG is met. Giving this article either more time or more participation for policy based comments. Mkdwtalk 19:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mkdwtalk 19:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. An event is presumed to be notable if it receives significant, non-routine coverage that persists over a period of time. Coverage should be in multiple reliable sources with national or global scope. From de:Haining Open 2014 the verifiable notability of the 2014 ought to be unquestioned. I did a search for sources on this years tournament, and there are plenty, a little selection in four languages...[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]

References

  1. ^ "Ding Junhui Wins Championship in Haining Open". cri.cn.
  2. ^ Zhang Jingya. "Haining Open: Ding Junhui outclasses Xu Si 4-1 to advance - CCTV News - CCTV.com English". cntv.cn.
  3. ^ Zhang Jingya. "CBSA Haining Open: World Number 3 from China crushes compatriot Tang 4-0 - CCTV News - CCTV.com English". cntv.cn.
  4. ^ "Ding Junhui in Semi-finals at Haining Open". cri.cn.
  5. ^ "Haining Open: Ding Junhui odwrócił losy finału i zwyciężył przed własną publicznością". Onet Sport. 23 October 2015.
  6. ^ "Haining Open: wielka stawka mało prestiżowego turnieju, świetna gra chińskich snookerzystów". Onet Sport. 21 October 2015.
  7. ^ "Ding Junhui holt bei den Haining Open ersten Titel seit 16 Monaten". Eurosport Deutschland. 23 October 2015.
  8. ^ "BBC Sport - Ryan Day beats Ding Junhui at International Championship". BBC Sport.
  9. ^ "Ding Junhui tumbles out of International Championship to Day after missing easy red". Eurosport British. 27 October 2015. Retrieved 8 November 2015.
  10. ^ "World Ladies' Champion enters Asian Snooker Tour event". The news Hub. Retrieved 8 November 2015.
  11. ^ "Allen progresses at International Championship". RTÉ Sport. 27 October 2015.
  12. ^ Александр Покачуев. "Китайское вторжение". mk.ru.
Sam Sailor Talk! 01:29, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.