Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hade Vansen (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus indicates that the subject of this article does not pass the WP:GNG Guerillero | My Talk 04:46, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hade Vansen[edit]

Hade Vansen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notable pro wrestler. He had a short career before he retired. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:53, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:PERNOM. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - his career before WWE has no sources at all. His career in WWE... it's not even WWE... he never made it past Florida Championship Wrestling, the developmental territory / training ground of WWE. Definitely ever made it to a major pro wrestling promotion. Overall, he seems too minor for notability. Starship.paint (talk) 12:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - He has notability from those promos that aired on SmackDown back in 2008. Sure, they never led to anything, but he did get exposure there. --GeicoHen (talk) 14:44, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems there was one promo. On one of the lowest-rated SmackDowns of the year. Probably didn't last a minute. And like you say, led to absolutely nothing. It's like being in a commercial, which only ran once. InedibleHulk (talk) 17:51, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – Article fails to establish notability. Sources used in the article either fail WP:SRC or don't even mention him at all. ~ twsx | talkcont | ~ 14:51, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete He does seem to be notable on some forums for his blink-or-you'll-miss-it SmackDown promo. I think Are You Serious? even joked that he would feud with The Undertaker. However, all of that is rather irrelevant in terms of wiki policy, as I don't see this passing WP:GNG.LM2000 (talk) 18:34, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.